Uri Savir, the Modern Peace Treaty
I am currently reading the book, Peace First, by Uri Savir. Savir was director of the Israeli Ministry of Foreign Affairs from 1993 to 1996 and served as Israel’s chief negotiator for the Oslo Accords. In 1996 he founded the Peres Center for Peace, and in 2001 he established the Glocal Forum, which encourages intercity diplomacy around the world.
From the book:
Drawing on his experiences negotiating the Oslo Peace Accords as well as on trenchant examples from Ethiopia, Eritrea, Rwanda, Sierra Leone, Afghanistan, India, Pakistan, Northern Ireland, and the former Yugoslavia, Savir argues that an enduring peace is built from the bottom up, not from the top down. He describes a new model based on establishing and nurturing mutually beneficial forms of cooperation beginning on the local level, city to city and organizations to organization.
In the first chapter, Savir outlines the current problems with the peace process between states which rely on obsolete elements and structural weaknesses. The peacemakers that are engaged in the international diplomatic discussions are most commonly previous warmakers who simply attempt to qualm violent outbreaks with a peace treaty which has minimally evolved beyond a “real estate” treaty.
Savir uses examples from many conflicts around the world to highlight the idea that these treaties do not take into consideration deep seated and structural issues between conflicting states. That means that the peace treaty only lasts a finite amount of time before the issue rises again and the states are once again in direct conflict.
Modern treaties fail to promote a culture of peace because they fall into old-fashioned peacemaking strategies. Specifically, these modern treaties
1. further traditional aims and dwell on the past;
2. reflect a narrow security doctrine;
3. fail to promote a culture of peace;
4. fail to establish a mechanism against increased socioeconomic gaps;
5. fail to emphasize economic cooperation;
6. lack planning for regional development and international assistance;
7. fail to promote peace socially and politically and lack implied sanctions against domestic opposition; and
8. involve past warmakers acting as peacemakers.
Of course, not all peace treaties fall into these traps. Many treaties have successfully ended a conflict which evolved into a culture of peace where nations are able to focus their energy on trade, cultural enrichment and scientific exchange.
Savir continues in the book to outline how to strengthen these peace treaties so that they can properly and sustainably promote a culture of peace.
Email me
npetten [at] gmail [dot] comeInterests
animation awareness broadcasting business collaboration community community development design development donations early childhood education empathy environment film funds global health health promotion homelessness imagination international living wage media MIT network non-profit Non-Profits opportunities peace peace treaty policy poverty power project social enterprise social good Social Media Technology travel trends university uri savir video volunteeringRecent Posts
- The Tipping Point: The Age of the Oil Sands
- Masters in Early Childhood Studies
- Graduate Diploma in Social Innovation
- Innovative Approaches to Corporate Social Responsibility
- Environmental Leader Spotlight: Naomi Klein
- How to Educate a Planet
- The Multiple Disciplines of Early Childhood Education
- How Corrie Met Benny
- Success Spoken Here: Preparing Citizens of the World
- Waterloo Institute for Social Innovation and Resilience
- See How Real Gifts Can Change The World
- Microsoft Future Vision on Productivity HD
- Be Nice to Spiders
- The Joy of Stats: Hans Rosling on World Population Health and Income
- Ken Robinson’s ‘Changing Education Paradigms’
- Roots of Empathy
- Economic Benefit of Early Childhood Education
- Learning Theories in the Early Childhood Classroom
- Force of Nature: The David Suzuki Movie
- explore: Oasis of Peace
Search










